Is this the first convincing case you can think of where hundreds of theoretical jobs were replaced? I mean, they didn't really "fire" 700 people, but are they going to avoid hiring some new folks as a result? You bet. I can't think of any other recent examples of this happening specifically due to AI (or AI being blamed for it, anyway).
Is this the first convincing case you can think of where hundreds of theoretical jobs were replaced? I mean, they didn't really "fire" 700 people, but are they going to avoid hiring some new folks as a result? You bet. I can't think of any other recent examples of this happening specifically due to AI (or AI being blamed for it, anyway).